![]() More details in Seam reference documentation guide in Section 38.2, “Integration testing Seam components”. MyFaces is actually a set of tag libraries, including the JSF core, the Tomahawk library, Trinidad, and more. ![]() Jboss-seam-x.y.z.Final/examples/booking/booking-tests/src/test/resources-integration/arquillian.xml: Remote or managed container and some specific options for JVM or Arquillian. Add arquillian.xml file into root of your classpath for running Arquillian test(s).Create a SeamTest-specific web.xml contaning the .MockSeamListener, instead of the usual .SeamListener.Add a method like Deployment ( name = "_your_test_name_" ) OverProtocol ( "Servlet 3.0" ) public static org.Your test class should extend .JUnitSeamTest instead of .SeamTest.More details are described in JBoss AS 7 documentation. I was introduced to Spring quite later in my software engineering career. ![]() This migration documentation prefers using of jboss-deployment-structure.xml file, which should be placed in META-INF directory of your WAR or EAR application according to your application type.įor full EAR projects, the jboss-deployment-structure.xml will be located in the _your_ear_/META-INF directory.įor Web (non-ear) projects, the jboss-deployment-structure.xml will be located in the _your_war_/WEB-INF directory. Jboss-deployment-structure.xml or in META-INF/MANIFEST.MF file in section Dependencies. Classloading of bundled or provided libraries can be managed in JBoss AS 7 has got refactored classloading model. You need to change datasource JNDI in your persistence.xml from java:/DefaultDS to java:jboss/datasources/ExampleDS. If you are using for development or testing default datasource in JBoss AS 7.1, Seam 2.3 uses JBoss AS 7 as default target runtime. Next level is migration of your target runtime. Next remainning migration step is pages.xml file(s) as well as other files only requires that the schemas be upgraded. ![]() And finally migrated declaration of components.xml for 2.3 version: Java EE (Java Enterprise Edition) differences between JSF 1.1 and 1.2 843842 edited Hi, I'm currently using JSF 1.2 RI but may have to roll back to JSF 1.1 (to use ICEfaces). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |